Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Hedef Bağlılığı Ölçeği Yapısının Öğretmen Adaylarında Yeniden Test Edilmesi

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1, 55 - 62, 02.01.2020

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, beş maddelik hedef bağlılığı ölçeğinin Türkçe sürümünün yapısının öğretmen adaylarında yeniden test edilmesidir. Araştırmaya antrenörlük eğitimi, spor yöneticiliği, rekreasyon, tarih, muhasebe, kamu yönetimi, felsefe, Türk dili, turizm, İngiliz dili, matematik, din kültürü ve ahlak bilgisi, resim, biyoloji, hemşirelik ve kimya bölümlerinden pedagojik formasyon alan 465 öğrenci katılmıştır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak, Hedef Bağlılığı Ölçeğinin Türkçe formu kullanılmıştır. KMO değeri 0.83 bulunurken Bartlett testi anlamlı çıkmıştır. AFA sonuçlarına göre, faktör yükleri 0,75 ve 0,84 arasında değişirken DFA faktör yükleri 0,68 ve 0,84 arasında değişmiştir. Ölçeğin tek boyutlu yapısı doğrulanmış, öz değer 3.265 olarak bulunmuştur. Çıkarılan boyutun genel varyansa katkısı %65.294 olarak bulunmuştur. Ölçeğin iç tutarlılık katsayısı Cronbach’s alfa değeri ile hesaplanmış, iç tutarlılık katsayısı 0.86 olarak bulunmuştur. DFA sonuçları ölçeğin mükemmel uyuma sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Ölçme eşdeğerliği analizleri ölçeğin cinsiyetler açısından değişmez olduğunu ortaya çıkarmıştır. Beş maddelik hedef bağlılığı ölçeğinin, öğretmen yetiştirme programlarında öğrenim gören öğrencilerin hedef bağlılıklarını ölçebilen geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçüm aracı olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

Kaynakça

  • Başusta, N. B. (2010). Ölçme eşdeğerliği. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 1(2), 58-64.
  • Becker, T. E., Klein, H. J., & Meyer, J. P. (2009). Accumulated wisdom and new directions for workplace commitments. In H. J. Klein, T. E. Becker, & J. P. Meyer (Eds.), Commitment in organizations: Accumulated wisdom and new directions (pp. 419–452). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor.
  • Burton, D. And Naylor, S. (2002). The Jekyll/Hyde Nature Of Goals: Revisiting And Updating Goal Setting Research. In T. Horn (Ed.), Advances In Sport Psychology (Pp. 459–499). Champaign, Il: Human Kinetics.
  • Cappelli, P. (2000). Managing without commitment. Organizational Dynamics, 28(4), 11–24. doi:10,1016/S0090-2616(00)00008-5
  • Cooper-Hakim, A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). The construct of work commitment: Testing an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 241–259. doi:10,1037/0033-2909,131,2,241
  • DeShon, R., & Landis, R. S. (1997). The dimensionality of the Hollenbeck, Williams, and Klein (1989) measure of goal commitment on complex tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 105–116.
  • Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2011). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
  • González, T. F., & Guillén, M. (2008). Organizational commitment: A proposal for a wider ethical conceptualization of “normative commitment”. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 401–414. doi:10,1007/s10551- 006-9333-9
  • Harrison, D. A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P. L. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 305– 325. doi:10,5465/AMJ,2006,20786077
  • Hollenbeck, J. R., & Klein, H. J. (1987). Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Problems, prospects, and proposals for future research. Journal of applied psychology, 72(2), 212-220.
  • Hollenbeck, J. R., Klein, H. J., O'Leary, A. M., & Wright, P. M. (1989). Investigation of the construct validity of a self-report measure of goal commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 951.
  • Hollenbeck, J. R., Williams, C. R., & Klein, H. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the antecedents of commitment to difficult goals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 18.
  • Klein, H. J., Molloy, J. C., & Brinsfield, C. T. (2012). Reconceptualizing workplace commitment to redress a stretched construct: Revisiting assumptions and removing confounds. Academy of management review, 37(1), 130-151.
  • Klein, H. J., Wesson, M. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., Wright, P. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2001). The assessment of goal commitment: A measurement model meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85(1), 32-55.
  • Latham, G. P. (2003). Goal Setting: A Five-Step Approach To Behavior Change. Organizational Dynamics, 32(3), 309-318.
  • Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational behavior and human performance, 3(2), 157-189.
  • Locke, E. A., & Kendall, L. M. (1965). The Relationship of Goals, Plans and Intentions to Choice Behavior. American Institutes For Research Silver Spring Md.
  • Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P., & Erez, M. (1988). The determinants of goal acceptance and commitment. Academy of Management Review, 13, 23–39.
  • Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. R, Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1968-1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125-152.
  • Osborne, J. W., & Banjanovic, E. S. (2016). Exploratory factor analysis with SAS. SAS Institute.
  • Şenel, E., & Yıldız, M. (2016). Hedef bağlılığı ölçeği: Türkçe uyarlaması, beden eğitimi ve spor alanında öğrenim gören öğrencilerde geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. CBÜ Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(2), 58-65.
  • Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association. Washington DC
  • Tubbs, M. E. (1993). Commitment as a moderator of the goal-performance relation: A case for clearer construct definition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 86–97.
  • Tubbs, M. E., & Ekeberg, S. E. (1991). The role of intentions in work motivation: Implications for goal-setting theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 16, 180–199.
  • Wright, P. M., O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., Cortina, J. M., Klein, H. J., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (1994). On the meaning and measurement of goal commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 795.

Retesting the Structure of the Goal Commitment Scale in the Teacher Candidates

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1, 55 - 62, 02.01.2020

Öz

This study aims to retest the structure of the Turkish version of the five-item goal commitment scale in the teacher candidates. Four hundred sixty-five students were recruited from the pedagogical formation education program including departments of coaching education, sport management, recreation, history, accounting, public management, philosophy, Turkish language, tourism, English language, mathematics, the culture of religion and knowledge of ethics, painting, biology, nursing, and chemistry. Hollenbeck, Williams, and Klein (1989) developed Goal Commitment Scale with nine items. Klein, Wesson, Hollenbeck, Wright and DeShon (2001) revised the scale to 5 items. Şenel and Yıldız (2016) translated the scale in Turkish and tested the reliability and validity with the participation of students studying in the physical education and sports field. The data were analyzed with SPSS 22,0 by using independent sample t-test, Pearson Correlation. The structure of the scale was analyzed by using CFA in the AMOS program and EFA in SPSS. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity values were calculated to determine whether the data was proper for the factor analysis. KMO value was found to be 0,83, while Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was statistically significant. According to EFA results, the factor loadings ranged between 0,75 and 0,84, while those in CFA ranged between 0,68 and 0,84. The scale displayed one dimension; the Eugene value was found to be 3,265. The contribution of the extracted dimension to the total variance was 65,294%. The internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0,86. Measurement invariance analysis revealed that goal commitment scale worked in the same way for both genders. The CFA results showed that the scale had a perfect fit.

Kaynakça

  • Başusta, N. B. (2010). Ölçme eşdeğerliği. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 1(2), 58-64.
  • Becker, T. E., Klein, H. J., & Meyer, J. P. (2009). Accumulated wisdom and new directions for workplace commitments. In H. J. Klein, T. E. Becker, & J. P. Meyer (Eds.), Commitment in organizations: Accumulated wisdom and new directions (pp. 419–452). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor.
  • Burton, D. And Naylor, S. (2002). The Jekyll/Hyde Nature Of Goals: Revisiting And Updating Goal Setting Research. In T. Horn (Ed.), Advances In Sport Psychology (Pp. 459–499). Champaign, Il: Human Kinetics.
  • Cappelli, P. (2000). Managing without commitment. Organizational Dynamics, 28(4), 11–24. doi:10,1016/S0090-2616(00)00008-5
  • Cooper-Hakim, A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). The construct of work commitment: Testing an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 241–259. doi:10,1037/0033-2909,131,2,241
  • DeShon, R., & Landis, R. S. (1997). The dimensionality of the Hollenbeck, Williams, and Klein (1989) measure of goal commitment on complex tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 105–116.
  • Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2011). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
  • González, T. F., & Guillén, M. (2008). Organizational commitment: A proposal for a wider ethical conceptualization of “normative commitment”. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 401–414. doi:10,1007/s10551- 006-9333-9
  • Harrison, D. A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P. L. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 305– 325. doi:10,5465/AMJ,2006,20786077
  • Hollenbeck, J. R., & Klein, H. J. (1987). Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Problems, prospects, and proposals for future research. Journal of applied psychology, 72(2), 212-220.
  • Hollenbeck, J. R., Klein, H. J., O'Leary, A. M., & Wright, P. M. (1989). Investigation of the construct validity of a self-report measure of goal commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 951.
  • Hollenbeck, J. R., Williams, C. R., & Klein, H. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the antecedents of commitment to difficult goals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 18.
  • Klein, H. J., Molloy, J. C., & Brinsfield, C. T. (2012). Reconceptualizing workplace commitment to redress a stretched construct: Revisiting assumptions and removing confounds. Academy of management review, 37(1), 130-151.
  • Klein, H. J., Wesson, M. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., Wright, P. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2001). The assessment of goal commitment: A measurement model meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85(1), 32-55.
  • Latham, G. P. (2003). Goal Setting: A Five-Step Approach To Behavior Change. Organizational Dynamics, 32(3), 309-318.
  • Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational behavior and human performance, 3(2), 157-189.
  • Locke, E. A., & Kendall, L. M. (1965). The Relationship of Goals, Plans and Intentions to Choice Behavior. American Institutes For Research Silver Spring Md.
  • Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P., & Erez, M. (1988). The determinants of goal acceptance and commitment. Academy of Management Review, 13, 23–39.
  • Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. R, Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1968-1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125-152.
  • Osborne, J. W., & Banjanovic, E. S. (2016). Exploratory factor analysis with SAS. SAS Institute.
  • Şenel, E., & Yıldız, M. (2016). Hedef bağlılığı ölçeği: Türkçe uyarlaması, beden eğitimi ve spor alanında öğrenim gören öğrencilerde geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. CBÜ Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(2), 58-65.
  • Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association. Washington DC
  • Tubbs, M. E. (1993). Commitment as a moderator of the goal-performance relation: A case for clearer construct definition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 86–97.
  • Tubbs, M. E., & Ekeberg, S. E. (1991). The role of intentions in work motivation: Implications for goal-setting theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 16, 180–199.
  • Wright, P. M., O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., Cortina, J. M., Klein, H. J., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (1994). On the meaning and measurement of goal commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 795.
Toplam 25 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Spor Hekimliği
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Ender Şenel

Yayımlanma Tarihi 2 Ocak 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 8 Kasım 2019
Kabul Tarihi 17 Aralık 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Şenel, E. (2020). Retesting the Structure of the Goal Commitment Scale in the Teacher Candidates. Gazi Beden Eğitimi Ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 25(1), 55-62.

Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi yılda dört kez yayımlanan bilimsel ve hakemli bir dergidir.


Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences is a scientific and peer-reviewed journal published quarterly.